Inside this week: Star Wars, veganism, and silicon spouses
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­
View in browser
GWI Logo

on the dot

8 January 2025

Hi folks,

We’re still getting back up to speed after the festive season, so this week is a little different. 2025 is a milestone year - halfway through the decade and a quarter of the way through the century. It’s a natural checkpoint that’s inspired some big predictions. 


The year might have only just begun, but we thought it’d be neat to use our data to fact-check some forecasts. Scroll down to read about the year depicted in Rudyard Kipling’s “With the Night Mail”, Stephen King’s “The Running Man”, and Hot Tub Time Machine 2.

Predictions to power your week

🌙 To get some of the bolder predictions out of the way - the astronomer Fred Hoyle foresaw a “Fall of Rome” type event, a NASA administrator imagined some of us would be “natives of the moon”, while a panel of scientists felt we’d have “specialized human mutants” by now. 

 

🚬 Some of the earliest predictions come from 1925, as writers and commentators set their sights 100 years to the future. Back then, a professor claimed tobacco smoking would be “a thing of the past” by now - pretty remarkable, considering how little was known about its health risks at the time. But a quarter of consumers worldwide still smoke, reminding us that social change can be very slow. 

 

💁‍♀️ The 1920s also saw one estimate that by 2025 “all wealth” would be “feminine hands”. That was a tad optimistic, though recent years have highlighted the growing influence of the “girl economy”. Professor Archibald Low predicted that women would “dress logically in a one-piece hygiene suit”, while another notorious prediction said women will opt for silicon rather than human partners. Let’s check in again on that one in 12 months.

 

💼 In 2000, TIME did a piece forecasting the hottest jobs of the future, and predicted the emergence of “data miners” who “will be on hand to extract useful tidbits from mountains of data, pinpointing behavior patterns for marketers”. Sounds like some people we know…

 

🛜 In 2014, a report compiled by Pew Research Center expected the Internet of Things and augmented reality to boom. Around that time many people predicted smartphones would be replaced by wearables (in one futurist’s words: “if you have a smartphone, people will laugh at you”). But even now, only 5% own a VR headset. 

 

 ⚖️ Many contributors to a second Pew report forecasting 2025, this time written in the aftermath of the Black Lives Matter protests, thought social justice would move up the agenda. But our research shows racial relations have slipped down America’s priority list - from the 3rd biggest concern in 2020 to 11th in 2024.

 

🚗 In 2017, economist Tony Seba suggested that no petrol cars would be sold in 2025. But this year only two countries (Norway and Ethiopia) will get close to this benchmark. And from our own research, we know that petrol/gasoline (55%) is still by far the fuel type most car intenders plan on getting for their next vehicle. 

 

🥑 A common prediction for 2025 was reduced meat eating. In 2019, a UK supermarket predicted a quarter of Brits would be vegetarian this year; instead, only 5% are, and the number of vegans has actually decreased in recent years. 

 

🩷 Some predictions are accurate by luck, but are worth sharing anyway. In 2005, someone suggested Barbie would have a “major comeback” (only a few years off), while Wired’s 2009 jest about future Star Wars sequels feels eerily on point now. And you have to give the New York Times some credit for calling that Beefeaters would still be guarding the Tower of London “in 2025 AD”. 

Key takeaways

The big lesson from all this: less happens than we think, and it often happens slowly. Technology changes fast, but society doesn’t. Existing systems often push back against rapid changes. Some of the most believable depictions of 2025 come from novels or short stories that made no attempt to describe future technology at all.

 

We tend to focus more on what could be built than on what people will actually use. A good example of the overconfidence around tech comes from Car Wash magazine, of all places. In 2014, it imagined a future of high-spec, automated car washes. But instead, the UK has seen a boom in hand washes, which are usually cheaper and more convenient. 

 

Hindsight is 20/20, but understanding different audiences matters. Knowing their values helps predict whether they’ll embrace, resist, or ignore new trends. 

onthedotcast

Chart of the week

FY2501_GL_IMG_OTD02_Chart_REPLACEMENT

As you’ve seen so far, most predictions are overly confident about technology. Just because something is technically possible to produce, it doesn’t mean it’ll scale, or that people will actually want it. So what do they want? Is there anything we can learn about consumer tech that might guide us to understanding what the next breakthrough products might be? 

 

Affordability comes first. Can products be sold at a price enough people are happy to buy? While not strictly a tech product, the cost of living crisis had an impact on reducing interest in vegan food, and we’re still trying to figure out what demand for EVs will look like as government subsidies are withdrawn.


Battery life is an important purchase driver that’s often forgotten, and is likely a big reason why AR and VR devices have struggled to fulfil predictions made on their behalf. So too are speed and comfort - it’s one thing for devices to perform well, but they need to do it quickly and be easy to wear or hold. Many futurists expected implants and wearables to have taken off by now, but a chip implanted behind the eyeball, as per one telecom company’s “Soul Catcher 2025” project from 1996, doesn’t sound all that comfortable, to be honest…

Local lowdown

Taiwanese nostalgia

If there’s another common oversight in predicting the future, it’s that we only look in one direction. When we look ahead, we don’t think enough about the cultural attachments we might carry forward from the past.

 

A good example of this comes from Taiwan, the country where consumers are more likely than any other to say they prefer thinking about the past, rather than the future. Taiwan is pretty unique among postcolonial countries in that it holds generally positive feelings towards its former colonizer, Japan. Taiwan also leads the world in playing baseball, another legacy of those years. 


So it provides a great case study of where modernization and tech development meet other forces. Even as Taiwan modernizes its cities, there are movements to preserve and protect traditional Japanese architecture on the island. And while Taiwan is also a world leader for using mobile payment services, there’s still a cultural attachment to cash at its famous night markets.

More from GWI

  • Looking ahead: 2025 consumer trends
  • Looking back: Last year's best marketing campaigns
  • Annual checkup: Track your brand health with GWI

Find us on LinkedIn   Find us on Twitter   Find us on Facebook   Find us on Instagram

Talk to someone today.

Or, if you need a break from us, we get it. You can always manage your preferences or unsubscribe.

© GWI 25 Farringdon Street, London, EC4A 4AB, United Kingdom